In previous commit 01f83d69844d307be2aa6fea88b0e8fe5cbdb2f4
the following comments were added:
"When peer uses tiny windows, there is no use in packetizing to sub-MSS
pieces for the sake of SWS or making sure there are enough packets in
the pipe for fast recovery."
The test should be > TCP_MSS_DE
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com]
> Your diff is reversed.
Sorry my apologies, I'll send a V2.
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com]
> Trying to cope with ridiculous windows these days is really a waste of
> time, as we perform this check for all tcp sendmsg() calls :(
I don't disagree with you but unfortunately there are still devices
out there like this and probably will be
In previous commit 01f83d69844d307be2aa6fea88b0e8fe5cbdb2f4
the following comments were added:
"When peer uses tiny windows, there is no use in packetizing to sub-MSS
pieces for the sake of SWS or making sure there are enough packets in
the pipe for fast recovery."
The test should be > TCP_MSS_DE
