On 5 April 2018 at 15:10, Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:
>
On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:2
his tree
> either
> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next
> iterations
> of this serie.
Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
receive the needed ack
On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arend van Spriel writes:
>
If I get it right, you mean something like this:
mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
...
broken-sg-support;
sd-head-align = 4;
cumentation/devicetree/bindings/{powerpc => soc}/fsl/guts.txt (91%)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c
>
> --
> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
>
Thanks, applied on my mmc tree for next!
I noticed that some DT compatibles weren't documented, according to
checkpatch. Please fix that asap!
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
On 1 November 2016 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 01:53:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 27 October 2016 at 13:41, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Ulf,
>> >
>> > On Thu
On 27 October 2016 at 13:54, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 27 October 2016 at 13:41, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On
the device and thus also the parent.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinn...@shawell.net>
Fixes: 8b1107b85efd ("PM / Runtime: Don't allow to suspend a device with an
a
On 27 October 2016 at 13:41, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> The smsc911c driver puts its device into low power state when entering
>> system su
On 21 September 2016 at 08:57, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the
> T4240-R1.0-R2.0
> eSDHC controller. To match the SoC version and revision, 10 previous version
> patchsets had tried many methods but all of them were rejected
On 6 September 2016 at 10:28, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> We keep running into cases where device drivers want to know the exact
> version of the a SoC they are currently running on. In the past, this has
> usually been done through a vendor specific API that can be called by a
>
On 26 May 2016 at 06:05, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Hi Uffe,
>
> Could we merge this patchset? ...
> It has been a long time to wait for Arnd's response...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
As we are still in the merge window I won't queue anything but fixes.
Let's give Arnd another week or so to
On 4 May 2016 at 05:24, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Add maintainer entry for Freescale SoC driver including
> the QE library and the GUTS driver now. Also add maintainer
> for QE library.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
So I need an ack from Scott and Qiang for this
>>
>> I was about to queue this for next, when I noticed that checkpatch is
>> complaining/warning lots about these patches. Can you please a round of
>> checkpatch and fix what makes sense.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
> [Lu Yangbo-B47093] Sorry about this, Uffe...
No worries!
> Should I ignore
On 1 April 2016 at 05:07, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the
> T4240-R1.0-R2.0
> eSDHC controller. To get the SoC version and revision, it's needed to add the
> GUTS driver to access the global utilities registers.
>
> So, the
15 matches
Mail list logo