RE: [net-next 04/14] i40e: dump VF information in debugfs

> -Original Message- > From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On > Behalf Of David Miller > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:20 AM > To: yuval.mi...@cavium.com > Cc: gerlitz...@gmail.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirs...@i

RE: [PATCH] i40e: limit client interface to X722 hardware

> -Original Message- > From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On > Behalf Of Stefan Assmann > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 12:52 PM > To: Or Gerlitz > Cc: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; Linux Netdev List >

RE: [PATCH] i40e: limit client interface to X722 hardware

> -Original Message- > From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On > Behalf Of Stefan Assmann > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 7:35 AM > To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T >

RE: Kernel 4.6.7-rt13: Intel Ethernet driver igb causes huge latencies in cyclictest

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On > Behalf Of Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5) > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 12:02 AM > To: Julia Cartwright ; Kirsher, Jeffrey T > ; Greg

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: Teardown SR-IOV before unregister_netdev()

ACK -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:19 PM To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject:

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] igb: Teardown SR-IOV before unregister_netdev()

ACK -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:19 PM To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject:

RE: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: Net result: zilch. No performance increase, no noticeable CPU utilization benefits. Nothing. So I dropped it. Do you have pointers to the patches perchance? Muli, I've been looking for this code and it looks like it's gone. I was using a Power5 system that I had

RE: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

David Miller wrote: Okay, but then using SG lists makes skbuff's much bigger. fraglistscatterlistper skbuff 32 bit 8 20 +12 * 18 = +216! 64 bit 16 32 +16 * 18 = +288 So never mind... I know,

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000: backport ich9 support from 7.5.5 ?

Mark McLoughlin wrote: I disagree, we should not break the current e1000 driver in the kernel while there is a new driver coming up that introduces ich9 support without breaking (the old e1000) support for all other devices. This is why we want to drop a new version of the e1000

Netpoll client software?

Hi folks, I'm looking for some suggestions for software that uses the kernel's netpoll interface to receive packets. The only in-kernel application that uses netpoll right now is netconsole, and that only sends packets. Used to be, netdump would use the netpoll interface for both transmit and

Re: [PATCH 08/23] e1000: add multicast stats counters

+{ rx_broadcast, E1000_STAT(stats.bprc) }, +{ tx_broadcast, E1000_STAT(stats.bptc) }, +{ rx_multicast, E1000_STAT(stats.mprc) }, +{ tx_multicast, E1000_STAT(stats.mptc) }, { rx_errors, E1000_STAT(net_stats.rx_errors) }, { tx_errors, E1000_STAT(net_stats.tx_errors)