> On May 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM "jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 30, 2015 at 2:24 AM "John A. Sullivan III"
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 01:52 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > &g
> On May 30, 2015 at 2:24 AM "John A. Sullivan III"
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 01:52 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Argh! yet another obstacle from my ignorance. We are attempting ingress
> > traffic shaping using IFB interfaces on traffic coming via GRE / IPSec.
> > Filters and
> On May 28, 2015 at 1:49 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 13:31 -0400, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
>
> > The overall product does but the video source feeds come over a different
> > network via UDP. There are, however, RTMP quality cont
> On May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:33 -0400, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
>
> > Our initial testing has been single flow but the ultimate purpose is
> > processing
> > real time video in a complex application w
> On May 28, 2015 at 12:26 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:45 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> > If your experimenting one thing you could do is create many
> > ifb devices and load balance across them from tc. I'm not
> > sure if this would be practical in your setup or not b
> On May 28, 2015 at 11:45 AM John Fastabend wrote:
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 08:30 AM, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
> >
> >> On May 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:38 -0400, jsulli...@ope
> On May 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:38 -0400, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
>
> IFB has still a long way before being efficient.
>
> In the mean time, you could play with following patch, and
> setup /sys/class/ne
> On May 25, 2015 at 6:31 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 16:05 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hello, all. One one of our connections we are doing intensive traffic
> > shaping with tc. We are using ifb interfaces for shaping ingress
> > traffic and we also use ifb inte
> On May 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:35 PM, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com
> wrote:
> >
> > I was also surprised to see that, although we are using a prio qdisc on the
> > bond, the physical interface is showing pfifo_fas
Hello, all. I'm troubleshooting why tunneled performance is degrade on one of
our Internet connections. Eric Dumazet was very helpful in some earlier issues.
We replace SFQ with fq_codel as the leaf qdisc on our HFSC classes and we no
longer have drops on the ifb interfaces.
However, now, we ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
