Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

2006-03-26 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sat, 2006-03-25 20:47:39 +0100, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: On Sat, Feb 25, Adrian Bunk wrote: CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. There is likely more code to support a modular unix.ko, this has to go as

[2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

2006-03-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: On Sat, Feb 25, Adrian Bunk wrote: CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. There is likely more code to support a modular unix.ko, this has to go as well. Sounds resonable, updated patch below. cu Adrian -- snip --

Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

2006-02-26 Thread Diego Calleja
El Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:13:08 -0800, Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and it runs fine (or it did last I tried). Whether that makes sense from a I've been running with CONFIG_UNIX=m since the dawn of time and everything

Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

2006-02-25 Thread Olaf Hering
On Sat, Feb 25, Adrian Bunk wrote: CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. There is likely more code to support a modular unix.ko, this has to go as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

2006-02-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:31:30PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 12:14 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: - Make the get_max_files export use _GPL - only unix.ko uses it. The real question is, does af_unix really need to allow beeing built modular? It's quite