Hi Tom,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:16:45AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> This does seem interesting and indeed the driver datapath looks very
> much like XDP. It would be quite interesting if you could rebase and
> then maybe look at how this can work with XDP that would be helpful.
OK I'll assign
Hi Jesper!
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:26:39PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> I definitely want to study it!
Great, at least I've not put this online for nothing :-)
> You mention XDP. If you didn't notice, I've created some documentation
> on XDP (it is very "live" documentation at this
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over the last 3 years I've been working a bit on high traffic processing
> for various reasons. It started with the wish to capture line-rate GigE
> traffic on very small fanless ARM machines and the framework has evolved
> to be used
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:28:52 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Over the last 3 years I've been working a bit on high traffic processing
> for various reasons. It started with the wish to capture line-rate GigE
> traffic on very small fanless ARM machines and the framework has evolved
> to be used at
Hi,
Over the last 3 years I've been working a bit on high traffic processing
for various reasons. It started with the wish to capture line-rate GigE
traffic on very small fanless ARM machines and the framework has evolved
to be used at my company as a basis for our anti-DDoS engine capable of
deal
