From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:10:54 +1000
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:31:42 -0700
Summary: dummy interface broadcast destination hardware
address
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:16:02PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
Perhaps RTN_BROADCAST should take precedence over IFF_NOARP
(but not IFF_LOOPBACK)? I'm talking about the code in
net/ipv4/arp.c that causes this behavior.
Sure, I don't see any harm in that.
However, I'm curious as to the
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:43:24 +1000
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:16:02PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
Perhaps RTN_BROADCAST should take precedence over IFF_NOARP
(but not IFF_LOOPBACK)? I'm talking about the code in
net/ipv4/arp.c that causes this
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:31:42 -0700
Summary: dummy interface broadcast destination hardware address
is not ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Very strange because the dummy device driver calls
ether_setup() which does:
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:31:42 -0700
Summary: dummy interface broadcast destination hardware address
is not ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Very strange because the dummy device driver calls
