Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:53:12 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325
Summary: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen
Kernel Version: 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6PAE 2.6.19-gentoo-r4
Status: NEW
Sorry, i will put my IMHO, since i am using it too.
I guess it can be useful for load-balancing scenario.
Is there way to provide both ways?
Thinking... 60% done, But maybe this can be done over -m statistic already
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:12:33 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
Andrew Morton wrote:
Denys wrote:
Sorry, i will put my IMHO, since i am using it too.
I guess it can be useful for load-balancing scenario.
That makes sense with using multiple IPs (and we support doing that),
but whats the point of load-balancing to differenet *ports*?
Is there way to provide both ways?
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:30:33 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
Denys wrote:
Sorry, i will put my IMHO, since i am using it too.
I guess it can be useful for load-balancing scenario.
That makes sense with using multiple IPs (and we support doing that),
but whats the point of
Denys wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:30:33 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
That makes sense with using multiple IPs (and we support doing that),
but whats the point of load-balancing to differenet *ports*?
Easy - for example i have my own TCP acceleration solution, which is using
REDIRECT,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:53:12 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325
Summary: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen
Kernel Version: 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6PAE 2.6.19-gentoo-r4
Status: NEW
Severity:
