From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:29:30 +0200
> Did you also get the patch to kill skb->tc_classid? I can only see
> the patch to remove the define in your 2.6.14 tree.
I just put it into the tree right now, it should show up on
kernel.org in about a half hour.
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:39:11 +0200
OK, here's the patch to remove it. Dave, please apply together with the
previous patch.
Patch applied, thanks.
Did you also get the patch to kill skb->tc_classid? I can only see
the patch
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:39:11 +0200
> OK, here's the patch to remove it. Dave, please apply together with the
> previous patch.
Patch applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Thomas Graf wrote:
@@ -535,7 +530,6 @@ static struct meta_ops __meta_ops[TCF_ME
[META_ID(TCINDEX)] = META_FUNC(int_tcindex),
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
[META_ID(TCVERDICT)]= META_FUNC(int_tcverd),
- [META_ID(TCCLASSID)]
* Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-17 04:09
> Kill skb->tc_classid. It leaves a hole on 64 bit machines, I didn't
> try to plug it since with all the planned changes we probably need
> some restructuring at the end anyway.
I have no objections to this, looks perfectly
fine to me.
> @@
Kill skb->tc_classid. It leaves a hole on 64 bit machines, I didn't
try to plug it since with all the planned changes we probably need
some restructuring at the end anyway.
[NET]: Kill skb->tc_classid
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED
