On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:35:53PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
...
I've applied this patch, thanks everyone.
Stephen, do we want this in -stable?
I got this info it went trough -mm too:
...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: - br_if-oops-in-port_carrier_check.patch removed from -mm tree
To:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:26:51 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:28:48 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my patch proposal for testing.
If it doesn't work -
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:55:29 -0800
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:26:51 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:28:48 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL
Here is my patch proposal for testing.
If it doesn't work - forget about it.
(Prepared with 2.6.20-git6 but could
be applied to 2.6.20 also.)
Jarek P.
dev_hold/dev_put added to prevent dev kfree
during port_carrier_check runnig, while dev
and port are removed.
Submitted and tested by: Pascal
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:28:48 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my patch proposal for testing.
If it doesn't work - forget about it.
(Prepared with 2.6.20-git6 but could
be applied to 2.6.20 also.)
Jarek P.
dev_hold/dev_put added to prevent dev kfree
during
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:28:48 +0100
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my patch proposal for testing.
If it doesn't work - forget about it.
(Prepared with 2.6.20-git6 but could
be applied to 2.6.20 also.)
