Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than logical && on gen_flags

2017-11-02 Thread David Miller
From: Colin King Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:04:12 + > From: Colin Ian King > > Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather > than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit > flag operations. Fix this. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#146

Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than logical && on gen_flags

2017-11-02 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 11/02/2017 09:04 PM, Colin King wrote: From: Colin Ian King Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit flag operations. Fix this. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460305 ("Logical vs. bitwise

[PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than logical && on gen_flags

2017-11-02 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit flag operations. Fix this. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460305 ("Logical vs. bitwise operator") Fixes: 3f7889c4c79b ("net: sched