Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips

2006-07-27 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Jeff Garzik wrote: It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name.

Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips

2006-07-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. Jeff Garzik wrote: It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same P

Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips

2006-07-19 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Jeff Garzik wrote: It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name.

Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips

2006-07-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Sergei Shtylylov wrote: It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name. As

[PATCH] Don't call request_region() for 3C90x chips

2006-07-10 Thread Sergei Shtylylov
It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name. As this is the only case of