Wei Yongjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I also send the same mail several ago, and get no response. You
> patch is fine. But I think following code has no effect:
>
> if (sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
>
> It just let UDP datagrams with checksum error be added into
This change does not effect to tcpdump, only let UDP filter can not
received UDP datagrams with checksum error. It is not a good idea, but
I think is the best way to resolve this problem. If you want to capture
error UDP packet, you can used tcpdump.
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:57, Gerrit Renker wr
cho reply.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerrit Renker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error
> This has been raised earlier, cf.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660
>
> Wei
Hi,
| if (!sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
|
| IPv6 doesn't do this, so I think delete condition 'sk->sk_filter' is better.
| Do you think so?
I think the sk->sk_filter is there for a good reason. If you delete it, that
routine
is forced to always compute UDP ch
This has been raised earlier, cf.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660
Wei Yongjun wrote:
| When I send a UDP datagrams with checksum error to target, I found that:
| Under IPv6, counter udpInErrors increased, but under IPv4 counter
| udpInDatagrams increased. I lookup into the sour
When I send a UDP datagrams with checksum error to target, I found that:
Under IPv6, counter udpInErrors increased, but under IPv4 counter
udpInDatagrams increased. I lookup into the source code, and found that,
under IPv4 UDP datagrams with checksum error will be delivered to UDP
receive queue, bu
