> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 6:22 AM
> To: #ZHOU BIN#
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Veno module for kernel 2.6.16.13
>
>
> On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN
On 5/24/06, #ZHOU BIN# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ u16 cntRTT; /* # of RTTs measured within last RTT */
+ /* veno->cntRTT = 0; */
It looks like this counter is never initialized, and the comment is deceiving.
Thomas Kho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
>-Original Message-
>From: David Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:24 AM
>To: #ZHOU BIN#
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
netdev@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Veno module for kernel 2.6.16.13
>
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:11:03 -0700
> The *desirability* of using this data is debatable, but it most
> certainly is possible.
Right, I don't think these kinds of schemes scale very well
personally.
I think TCP can certainly infer these attributes us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: "#ZHOU BIN#" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:30:48 +0800
>>
>>> Yes, I agree. Actually the main contribution of TCP Veno is not in
>>> this AI phase. No matte
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:50:11 -0700
> The general idea of resetting cwnd to an estimate of capacity seems to
> be a general feature of Westwood, Veno, Compound and Africa. Also FreeBSD
> does the same thing, but they don't have a cool name.
Interestin
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "#ZHOU BIN#" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:30:48 +0800
>
> > Yes, I agree. Actually the main contribution of TCP Veno is not in
> > this AI phase. No matter the ABC is added or not, TCP Veno
From: "#ZHOU BIN#" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:30:48 +0800
> Yes, I agree. Actually the main contribution of TCP Veno is not in
> this AI phase. No matter the ABC is added or not, TCP Veno can
> always improve the performance over wireless networks, according to
> our tests.
It
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:47 AM
To: Baruch Even
Cc: #ZHOU BIN#; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP Veno module for kernel 2.6.16.13
On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:16:52 +0100
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #ZHOU BIN# wrote:
>
On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:16:52 +0100
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #ZHOU BIN# wrote:
> > From: Bin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > + else if (sysctl_tcp_abc) {
> > + /* RFC3465: Apppriate Byte Count
> > + * increase once for each full cwnd acked.
#ZHOU BIN# wrote:
> From: Bin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> + else if (sysctl_tcp_abc) {
> + /* RFC3465: Apppriate Byte Count
> + * increase once for each full cwnd acked.
> + * Veno has no idear about it so far, so we keep
> +
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Hope you don't mind if I will run it through Lindent first to cleanup
> whitespace.
How about dropping the mixed caps, as well?
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body
On Wed, 24 May 2006 19:08:05 +0800
"#ZHOU BIN#" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> TCP Veno module is a new congestion control module to improve TCP performance
> over wireless networks. The key innovation in TCP Veno is the enhancement of
> TCP Reno/Sack conges
From: Bin Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TCP Veno module is a new congestion control module to improve TCP performance
over wireless networks. The key innovation in TCP Veno is the enhancement of
TCP Reno/Sack congestion control algorithm by using the estimated state of a
connection based on TCP Vega
14 matches
Mail list logo
