Re: [PATCH] at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn"

Hello. On 21/12/16 19:30, Chris Healy wrote: On Dec 21, 2016 5:11 AM, "Stefan Schmidt" > wrote: Hello. On 19/12/16 00:25, Andrey Smirnov wrote: Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so

Re: [PATCH] at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn"

Hello. On 19/12/16 00:25, Andrey Smirnov wrote: Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to fix that. We need to make sure

[PATCH] at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn"

Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to fix that. As a an example of where such restriction might be inconvenient, consider