Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Auke Kok wrote: From: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the advertising field has the implementation. this patch just adds it for supported reporting.

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Ben Hutchings wrote: Auke Kok wrote: From: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the advertising field has the implementation. I reported this lack on

[PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Auke Kok
From: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the advertising field has the implementation. this patch just adds it for supported reporting. Signed-off-by: Jesse

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
Auke Kok wrote: From: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the advertising field has the implementation. I reported this lack on Sourceforge a while back:

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
Kok, Auke wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: Auke Kok wrote: From: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the advertising field has the implementation. I