From: David Arcari
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:07:16 -0400
> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
>
> Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that
On 2017-03-13 7:07 PM, David Arcari wrote:
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu =
On 2017-03-08 4:33 PM, David Arcari wrote:
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu =
On 03/14/2017 02:07 AM, David Arcari wrote:
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu =
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu = new_mtu; This is not true in the case where
On 03/13/2017 03:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Arcari
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:50:50 -0400
>
>> On 03/13/2017 02:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: David Arcari
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
>>>
When the aquantia device
From: David Arcari
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:50:50 -0400
> On 03/13/2017 02:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Arcari
>> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
>>
>>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>>>
On 03/13/2017 02:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Arcari
> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
>
>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu
>> change.
>>
>>
From: David Arcari
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
>
> Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that
On 09.03.2017 23:28, David Arcari wrote:
On 03/09/2017 03:01 PM, David Arcari wrote:
On 03/09/2017 02:02 PM, Pavel Belous wrote:
On 09.03.2017 00:33, David Arcari wrote:
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not
On 03/09/2017 03:01 PM, David Arcari wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 02:02 PM, Pavel Belous wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09.03.2017 00:33, David Arcari wrote:
>>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>>> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu
>>>
On 03/09/2017 02:02 PM, Pavel Belous wrote:
>
>
> On 09.03.2017 00:33, David Arcari wrote:
>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu
>> change.
>>
>> Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly
On 09.03.2017 00:33, David Arcari wrote:
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu =
When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu change.
Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
assignment ndev->mtu = new_mtu; This is not true in the case where
14 matches
Mail list logo