From: Mike Manning
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:06:40 +0100
> In the absence of a reply from Mahesh, I would be most grateful for
> anyone familiar with the IPv6 code to review this 1-line fix.
>
> Or if not, then I request that the commit f784ad3d79e5 is backed out,
> as its intention is to remove
Hi,
In the absence of a reply from Mahesh, I would be most grateful for
anyone familiar with the IPv6 code to review this 1-line fix.
Or if not, then I request that the commit f784ad3d79e5 is backed out,
as its intention is to remove the redundant but harmless RTM_DELADDR
for addresses in tentativ
From: Mike Manning
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 15:52:55 +0100
> Commit f784ad3d79e5 ("ipv6: do not send RTM_DELADDR for tentative
> addresses") incorrectly assumes that no RTM_NEWADDR are sent for
> addresses in tentative state, as this does happen for the standard
> IPv6 use-case of DAD failure, see
Commit f784ad3d79e5 ("ipv6: do not send RTM_DELADDR for tentative
addresses") incorrectly assumes that no RTM_NEWADDR are sent for
addresses in tentative state, as this does happen for the standard
IPv6 use-case of DAD failure, see the call to ipv6_ifa_notify() in
addconf_dad_stop(). So as a result
