Brian Braunstein wrote:
From: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses.
Okay, the attached patch applies. Can someone comment on whether
it makes sense? (pasted inline for comments)
From: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed tun/tap driver's
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:29:29AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote:
From: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No need for this line. This line is used when you _forward_ another patch
from others. Signed-off-by is enough
Signed-off-by: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Kernel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0200, ahmed wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:29:29AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote:
--- linux-2.6.20.4-ORIG/drivers/net/tun.c 2007-03-23
12:52:51.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.20.4/drivers/net/tun.c2007-03-25 00:44:20.0
-0700
@@
Brian Braunstein wrote:
From: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses. The hw address is
stored in
both the net_device.dev_addr and tun.dev_addr fields. These fields were
not
kept synchronized, and in fact weren't even initialized to the same
From: Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses. The hw address is stored in
both the net_device.dev_addr and tun.dev_addr fields. These fields were not
kept synchronized, and in fact weren't even initialized to the same value.
Now during both init and
