Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Yuriy N. Shkandybin
: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:31 AM Subject: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:39:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:07:00 +0200 After

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Yuriy N. Shkandybin
: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:31 AM Subject: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:39:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:07:00 +0200 After

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:49:47PM +0400, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote: I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. Jura Many thanks, Jura! It seems reality is sometimes merciful... On the other hand I wonder, how all this could stay so long: a configuration similar

Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:49:47PM +0400, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote: I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. So, you mean only this one patch - without previous vlan patch? Very interesting... Thanks once more, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning

2007-05-14 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:39:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:07:00 +0200 After sending this patch I was a little confused, when next lockdep warning report appeared, and I thought - since this is not enough, this patch