From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:58:56 -0700
> On 09/26/2015 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Alexander Duyck
>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:56:08 -0700
>>
>>> Rather than carry around a value of budget that is 0 or less we can
>>> instead
>>> just loop through and pass 0 to e
On 09/26/2015 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:56:08 -0700
Rather than carry around a value of budget that is 0 or less we can instead
just loop through and pass 0 to each napi->poll call. If any driver
returns a value for work done that is non-zer
From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:56:08 -0700
> Rather than carry around a value of budget that is 0 or less we can instead
> just loop through and pass 0 to each napi->poll call. If any driver
> returns a value for work done that is non-zero then we can report that
> driver and co
For some reason we were carrying the budget value around between the
various calls to napi->poll. If for example one of the drivers called had
a bug in which it returned a non-zero value for work this could result in
the budget value becoming negative.
Rather than carry around a value of budget t
