On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:18 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
There is no point in trying to handle source MAC address based VLANs in
the wireless stack, something like smacvlan modeled after macvlan
should be sufficient.
Whoops. I only forgot the use with encryption. Please consider this
patch
There is no point in trying to handle source MAC address based VLANs in
the wireless stack, something like smacvlan modeled after macvlan
should be sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
We could just not keep the hole as well since people can't really be
using that
