Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support

2018-03-07 Thread David Miller
From: Shuah Khan Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 12:51:06 -0700 > That said, I am open to adding a distinct state for skipped because > can't be run. That is what I think should happen.

Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support

2018-03-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 03/07/2018 11:25 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Anders Roxell > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100 > >> The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The >> test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a >> pass. >> >>

Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support

2018-03-07 Thread David Miller
From: Anders Roxell Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100 > The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The > test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a > pass. > > Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for

[PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support

2018-03-06 Thread Anders Roxell
The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a pass. Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell ---