On 03/20/2018 01:58 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
> x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
> commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when
> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y")
On 3/20/18 10:00 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:05:15AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 3/20/18 5:58 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
x86_64. So, it fails when
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:05:15AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/18 5:58 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
> > x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
> > commit 09584b406742 ("bpf:
On 3/20/18 5:58 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes
Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that
case.
However, it does