[PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix

2006-10-04 Thread paul . moore
This patchset includes an update to the NetLabel/secid-reconciliation patch, replacing my v3 patch from earlier this week, and a bugfix patch to cure a race condition found during testing this week. The bugfix patch does not rely on the secid patches and should be merged regardless as it fixes a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix

2006-10-04 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patchset includes an update to the NetLabel/secid-reconciliation patch, replacing my v3 patch from earlier this week, and a bugfix patch to cure a race condition found during testing this week. The bugfix patch does not rely on the secid

RE: [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix

2006-10-04 Thread Venkat Yekkirala
As for the rest of the network labeling, please work together with Venkat and the SELinux developers on a final patchset which meets all of the design goals and has been tested, with policy which has been merged upstream and is available via Fedora devel. Please keep the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix

2006-10-04 Thread Paul Moore
Venkat Yekkirala wrote: As for the rest of the network labeling, please work together with Venkat and the SELinux developers on a final patchset which meets all of the design goals and has been tested, with policy which has been merged upstream and is available via Fedora devel. Please

Re: [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix

2006-10-04 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul Moore wrote: So, patch 2/2 should go in on it's own against upstream? If so, in 5B future, please post such patches separately. Yes, please commit patch 2/2 regardless as it fixes a bug which is not dependent on any of the secid patches which are being discussed.