Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Paul, Am 10.12.2015 um 12:31 schrieb Paul Bolle: > 1/3 ran into objections and, I think, Alan Cox is working on an > alternative for it. Would you mind resending 2/3 and 3/3 as a two > patches series? Feel free to add > Acked-by: Paul Bolle > > to both. Alan's patch

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Tilman, On za, 2015-12-12 at 19:09 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 10.12.2015 um 12:31 schrieb Paul Bolle: > > 1/3 ran into objections and, I think, Alan Cox is working on an > > alternative for it. Would you mind resending 2/3 and 3/3 as a two > > patches series? Feel free to add > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Tilman, On di, 2015-12-08 at 12:00 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > this series is the result of our discussion on the "freeing an > active object" bug. I split my proposed patch into two patches > for the separate topics of moving the ser_cardstate kfree() and > dropping the useless kfree()s,

[PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Paul, this series is the result of our discussion on the "freeing an active object" bug. I split my proposed patch into two patches for the separate topics of moving the ser_cardstate kfree() and dropping the useless kfree()s, and also included an unrelated patch (1/3) that had fallen through