On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
Outstanding items include resolving the igmp skb hook issue
generally,
testing to verify both the design and implementation, and
ensuring that
all the related policy changes are merged upstream first.
Regarding the igmp hook issue, we
From an initial review of this patchset, it doesn't look
quite ready to
queue for 2.6.20 (which I plan to to via git once it is).
Outstanding items include resolving the igmp skb hook issue
generally,
testing to verify both the design and implementation, and
ensuring that
all the
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please consider this for inclusion into 2.6.20. If it's too soon to be
thinking of 2.6.20 let me know and I'll rebase/resend this patchset once I see
notice of David's net-2.6.20 git tree.
From an initial review of this patchset, it doesn't look
James Morris wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please consider this for inclusion into 2.6.20. If it's too soon to be
thinking of 2.6.20 let me know and I'll rebase/resend this patchset once I see
notice of David's net-2.6.20 git tree.
From an initial review of this
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Paul Moore wrote:
I'll keep the patchset up to date and keep tracking the secid patches (I know
there has been discussion around the IGMP hook this morning). Once everything
looks okay I'll resend the patchset (with any updates/corrections/etc.) again.
Thanks. I think
