On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi,
Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
Two questions:
1 - what is the memory use impact on the system which don't do
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi,
Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
Two questions:
1 - what is the memory use impact on the system which don't do swap over
NFS, such as embedded systems, and
2 - what is the advantage
Hi,
Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
[ patches against 2.6.24-rc5-mm1, also to be found online at:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/v2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ ]
The patch-set can be split in
Hi Peter,
A major feature of this patch set is the network receive deadlock
avoidance, but there is quite a bit of stuff bundled with it, the NFS
user accounting for a big part of the patch by itself.
Is it possible to provide a before and after demonstration case for just
the network receive
