On Jan 7 2008 17:10, Vince Fuller wrote:
--- net/ipv4/devinet.c.orig2007-04-12 10:16:23.0 -0700
+++ net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-01-07 16:55:59.0 -0800
@@ -594,6 +594,8 @@ static __inline__ int inet_abc_len(__be3
rc = 16;
else if
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jan 7 2008 17:10, Vince Fuller wrote:
--- net/ipv4/devinet.c.orig 2007-04-12 10:16:23.0 -0700
+++ net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-01-07 16:55:59.0 -0800
@@ -594,6 +594,8 @@ static __inline__ int
On Jan 11 2008 17:49, David Miller wrote:
From: Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800
I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
patches.
Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
your patch and respin it against
Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
from Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka class-E) address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
Wouldn't it be wise to at least wait for it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:17:02 +0100), Andi Kleen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
from Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka class-E) address space as
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:17:02PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
from Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka class-E) address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
There is no positive consesus on this draft
at the intarea meeting in Vancouver, right?
We cannot / should not enable that space until we have reached
a consensus on it.
This is so incredibly
From: Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800
I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
patches.
Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
your patch and respin it against current sources as I asked
of you.
I'll
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)),
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
There is no positive consesus on this draft
at the intarea meeting in Vancouver,
Hello.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800), Vince
Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
#define IN_MULTICAST_NET 0xF000
+#define IN_CLASSE(a) long int) (a)) 0xf000) == 0xf000)
+#define IN_CLASSE_NET 0xff00
+#define
From: Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800
from Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka class-E) address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
from Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
(aka class-E) address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
Signed-off-by: Vince Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- include/linux/in.h.orig 2007-04-12
12 matches
Mail list logo
