Soon I will analyze the previous patch. I will let you know.
Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:28 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, Jiri
>
> The dumped source code is in the attachment. Please check it. I think
> this file can explain all.
>
> If anything, please just let me know.
> Thanks a lot.
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:01:54 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
> How to explain the following source code? As you mentioned, are the
> #ifdefs in the following source pointless?
They are not, the code would not compile without them. Look how struct
vxlan_dev is defined.
Those are really basic questions you ha
Hi, Jiri
How to explain the following source code? As you mentioned, are the
#ifdefs in the following source pointless?
As to the previous patch, I will compile and analyze it. But now I am
busy with something else. After I draw a conclusion, I will let you
know.
Thanks for your reply.
static
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:23:31 +0800, zyjzyj2...@gmail.com wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> @@ -2647,15 +2647,15 @@ static struct socket *vxlan_create_sock(struct net
> *net, bool ipv6,
> int err;
>
> memset(&udp_conf, 0, sizeof(udp_conf));
> -
> +#if IS
From: Zhu Yanjun
The source code is related with ipv6. As such, it is better to insert
ipv6 macro.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index e7d1668..9af6600 100644
