On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:36:49PM +0530, Krishna Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
diff -ruNp org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
--- org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c 2007-07-20
07:49:28.0 +0530
+++
Hi Evgeniy,
Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/23/2007 04:18:26 PM:
static void ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_wc
*wc)
{
struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ int i = 0, num_completions;
+ int tx_ring_index = priv-tx_tail
diff -ruNp org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
--- org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c 2007-07-20 07:49:28.0
+0530
+++ rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c2007-07-22
00:08:37.0 +0530
@@ -242,8 +242,9 @@
+ /*
+ * Handle skbs completion from tx_tail to wr_id. It is possible to
+ * handle WC's from earlier post_sends (possible multiple) in this
+ * iteration as we move from tx_tail to wr_id, since if the last
+ * WR (which is the one which had a completion request)
Hi Micheal,
Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/22/2007 03:11:36
PM:
+ /*
+* Handle skbs completion from tx_tail to wr_id. It is possible to
+* handle WC's from earlier post_sends (possible multiple) in this
+* iteration as we move from tx_tail to wr_id, since
