On 7/22/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:02:03 -0300
>
> > The second one again, also at:
> >
> > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.14.git
>
> How is this handling prope
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:02:03 -0300
> The second one again, also at:
>
> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.14.git
How is this handling properly the case where sk_prot changes?
Do you remember we had that probl
Dave,
The second one again, also at:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.14.git
- Arnaldo
sk_refcnt_debug.patch
Description: Binary data
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ extern int sk_wait_data(struct sock *sk,
struct request_sock_ops;
+#undef SOCK_REFCNT_DEBUG
+
Why are you doing this here? Leftover from debugging?
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this li
Hi David,
Please consider pulling from:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.git/
--
- Arnaldo
tree b2d1a14c34bd0880d421a31a909de6a9c2400f75
parent 18cdbd737f99ac20a3cd9a700d5f616a7db2ebd1
author Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1121896161 -0300
commi
