On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:30 PM, David Miller
wrote:
From: Josef Bacik
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:07:01 -0500
In inet_csk_get_port we seem to be using smallest_port to figure
out where the
best place to look for a SO_REUSEPORT sk that matches with an
existing set of
SO_REUSEPORT's. Howev
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 13:30 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:07:01 -0500
>
> > In inet_csk_get_port we seem to be using smallest_port to figure out where
> > the
> > best place to look for a SO_REUSEPORT sk that matches with an existing set
> > of
> > S
From: Josef Bacik
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:07:01 -0500
> In inet_csk_get_port we seem to be using smallest_port to figure out where the
> best place to look for a SO_REUSEPORT sk that matches with an existing set of
> SO_REUSEPORT's. However if we get to the logic
>
> if (smallest_size != -1)
In inet_csk_get_port we seem to be using smallest_port to figure out where the
best place to look for a SO_REUSEPORT sk that matches with an existing set of
SO_REUSEPORT's. However if we get to the logic
if (smallest_size != -1) {
port = smallest_port;
goto have_port;
}
we will d
