Patrick McHardy wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 8ae077f..0c46938 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -380,71 +380,71 @@ static void sfq_perturbation(unsigned long arg)
}
}
-static int sfq_change(struct
Corey Hickey wrote:
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 8ae077f..0c46938 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -380,71 +380,71 @@ static void sfq_perturbation(unsigned long arg)
}
}
-static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct
Factor code out of sfq_init() and sfq_destroy(), again so that the
new functions can be used by sfq_change() later.
Actually, as the diff itself shows, most of the sfq_q_init() code
comes from the original sfq_change(), but sfq_change() is only
called by sfq_init() right now. Thus, it is safe to
Factor code out of sfq_init() and sfq_destroy(), again so that the
new functions can be used by sfq_change() later.
Actually, as the diff itself shows, most of the sfq_q_init() code
comes from the original sfq_change(), but sfq_change() is only
called by sfq_init() right now. Thus, it is safe to
