David Miller writes:
The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
because currently it is set but never used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect Robert wanted to play around with some generation
ID optimizations but never got around
From: Robert Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:32 +0100
The idea was to have a selective flush of route cache entries when
a fib insert/delete happened. From what I remember you added another/
better solution. Just a list with route cache entries pointing to parent
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:06:57 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Robert Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:32 +0100
The idea was to have a selective flush of route cache entries when
a fib insert/delete happened. From what I remember you added
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:35:55 -0800
I will be glad to get this working. Is there any point in doing the a
small systems version as well?
Not at this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:45:15 -0800
The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
because currently it is set but never used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
I suspect Robert wanted to play around with
The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
because currently it is set but never used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:18:34.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:26:34.0 -0800
@@
