On Sunday 29 October 2006 11:22, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > Also, is it possible for any other error bits to be set at the same
> > time as OE? such bits would not be printed to the log in this case.
>
> Not sure, but arguably, this wouldn't be very interesting. Actually,
> now I'm wondering w
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:15:28AM -0700, Ray Lehtiniemi wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.19-rc3/drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c
> > ===
> > --- linux-2.6.19-rc3.orig/drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.19-rc3/drivers/net/arm/ep93x
On Sunday 29 October 2006 06:06, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Flooding the console with an RX FIFO overrun error for every single
> dropped packet isn't very sensible. The hardware is very underpowered
> according to today's standards, and RX FIFO overrun errors can be
> triggered quite easily, so d
Flooding the console with an RX FIFO overrun error for every single
dropped packet isn't very sensible. The hardware is very underpowered
according to today's standards, and RX FIFO overrun errors can be
triggered quite easily, so don't report them at all.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL
