Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.

2007-09-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:13:02 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] @@ -25,6 +26,3 @@ clean: LDLIBS+= -ldl LDFLAGS += -Wl,-export-dynamic - -%.so: %.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared $ -o $@ %) How do we

[PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.

2007-09-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:17:43 -0600 This patch contains small compile and implementation bug fixes for link_veth.c. The compile fixes stop trying to build a shared object when we can just as easily compile the code in. Making support of non arch/i386

Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.

2007-09-12 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
[snip] @@ -25,6 +26,3 @@ clean: LDLIBS += -ldl LDFLAGS += -Wl,-export-dynamic - -%.so: %.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared $ -o $@ %) How do we get the .so file then? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 4/4] [IPROUTE2] iproute2: link_veth support bug fixes.

2007-09-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] @@ -25,6 +26,3 @@ clean: LDLIBS += -ldl LDFLAGS += -Wl,-export-dynamic - -%.so: %.c -$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared $ -o $@ %) How do we get the .so file then? The code was built into iproute2, so we don't need the .so file.