Andrey Savochkin wrote:
The main reason is that socket hash tables should be large enough to work
efficiently, but it isn't good to waste a lot of memory for each namespace.
Namespaces should be cheap enough, to allow to have hundreds of them.
This reason of memory efficiency, of course, has a p
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > Socket hash lookups are made within namespace.
> > Hash tables are common for all namespaces, with
> > additional permutation of indexes.
>
> Hi Andrey,
>
> why is the hash table common and not inst
Andrey Savochkin wrote:
Socket hash lookups are made within namespace.
Hash tables are common for all namespaces, with
additional permutation of indexes.
Hi Andrey,
why is the hash table common and not instanciated multiple times for
each namespace like the routes ?
-
To unsubscribe from th
Socket hash lookups are made within namespace.
Hash tables are common for all namespaces, with
additional permutation of indexes.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/ipv6.h |3 ++-
include/net/inet6_hashtables.h |6 --
include/net/inet_h
