> Thanks. When I posted this last time around (19th Jan) I mentioned
> about marking the old _indirect() accessors with __deprecated - is
> that still something we want to do?
>
> I haven't tested this against net-next yet, so I don't know if there
> are any new users of the indirect accessors -
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:30:38PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 03/19/17 à 03:59, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
> > This series of patches does exactly that - we merge the functionality
> > of the indirect accesses into the clause 45 accessors, and use these
> > exclusively to access
Le 03/19/17 à 03:59, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This series cleans up the phylib MMD accessors. We have two accessors
> at present, phy_(read|write)_mmd() and phy_(read|write)_mmd_indirect()
>
> The _indirect methods access the MMD registers via a clause 22 phy,
> whereas the
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:59:44AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series cleans up the phylib MMD accessors. We have two accessors
> at present, phy_(read|write)_mmd() and phy_(read|write)_mmd_indirect()
>
> The _indirect methods access the MMD registers via a clause 22
Hi,
This series cleans up the phylib MMD accessors. We have two accessors
at present, phy_(read|write)_mmd() and phy_(read|write)_mmd_indirect()
The _indirect methods access the MMD registers via a clause 22 phy,
whereas the non-_indirect methods acess via clause 45 accesses.
Current
