On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:43:21PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> Do you see any value in having incremental support in libbpf that
> could be used as a fallback for older kernels like in patch #2 of this
> series? I could imagine libbpf probing kernel support for
> global/static variables and att
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:01 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:47:29PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > Add tests for libbpf relocation of static variable references into the
> > .data and .bss sections of the ELF.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
> ...
> > +#define __f
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:47:29PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Add tests for libbpf relocation of static variable references into the
> .data and .bss sections of the ELF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
...
> +#define __fetch(x) (__u32)(&(x))
> +
> +static __u32 static_bss = 0; /* Reloc referen
Add tests for libbpf relocation of static variable references into the
.data and .bss sections of the ELF.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 44 +
.../selftests/bpf/test_static_da
