Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][NET] fs_enet: check for phydev existence in the ethtool handlers

2008-01-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Anton Vorontsov wrote: Otherwise oops will happen if ethernet device has not been opened: Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x014c Faulting instruction address: 0xc016f7f0 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] MPC85xx NIP: c016f7f0 LR: c01722a0 CTR:

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][NET] fs_enet: check for phydev existence in the ethtool handlers

2008-01-09 Thread Sergej Stepanov
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2008, 22:05 +0300 schrieb Anton Vorontsov: Otherwise oops will happen if ethernet device has not been opened: Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x014c Faulting instruction address: 0xc016f7f0 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][NET] fs_enet: check for phydev existence in the ethtool handlers

2008-01-09 Thread Matvejchikov Ilya
Hi folks! I had the same problem too. The solution was the following: http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg37951.html Also have a look at the potential multicasting recovery problem in fs_enet driver: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=10700 Best regards,

Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][NET] fs_enet: check for phydev existence in the ethtool handlers

2008-01-09 Thread Matvejchikov Ilya
Hi folks! I had the same problem too. The solution was the following: http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg37951.html Also have a look at the potential multicasting recovery problem in fs_enet driver: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=10700 Best regards,