On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 09:23:46AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
>
>
> On 3/26/2018 9:03 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 3/25/18 12:38 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >> From: Leon Romanovsky
> >>
> >> In iproute2 package, the updates of UAPIs files are performed
> >> after the needed feature lands in kerne
On 3/26/2018 9:03 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/25/18 12:38 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> From: Leon Romanovsky
>>
>> In iproute2 package, the updates of UAPIs files are performed
>> after the needed feature lands in kernel's net-next tree.
>>
>> Such development flow created delays to the rdma
On 3/25/18 12:38 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky
>
> In iproute2 package, the updates of UAPIs files are performed
> after the needed feature lands in kernel's net-next tree.
>
> Such development flow created delays to the rdma tool developers,
> who uses rdma-next tree as a b
> Subject: [PATCH iproute2-next] rdma: Move RDMA UAPI header file to be
> under RDMA responsibility
>
> From: Leon Romanovsky
>
> In iproute2 package, the updates of UAPIs files are performed
> after the needed feature lands in kernel's net-next tree.
>
> Such
From: Leon Romanovsky
In iproute2 package, the updates of UAPIs files are performed
after the needed feature lands in kernel's net-next tree.
Such development flow created delays to the rdma tool developers,
who uses rdma-next tree as a basis for their work.
Move RDMA UAPI file to be under rdma
