On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:27:39PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > Some users observed that "least connection" distribution algorithm doesn't
> > handle well bursts of TCP connections from reconnecting clients after
> > a node
Hello,
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Some users observed that "least connection" distribution algorithm doesn't
> handle well bursts of TCP connections from reconnecting clients after
> a node or network failure.
>
> This is because the algorithm counts active connection
Hello,
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Some users observed that "least connection" distribution algorithm doesn't
> handle well bursts of TCP connections from reconnecting clients after
> a node or network failure.
>
> This is because the algorithm counts active connection
Some users observed that "least connection" distribution algorithm doesn't
handle well bursts of TCP connections from reconnecting clients after
a node or network failure.
This is because the algorithm counts active connection as worth 256
inactive ones where for TCP, "active" only means TCP