On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:27 -0500, tedheadster wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:03:43 -0700
> >
> > > From: Eric Dumazet
> > >
> > > It seems we have to be more careful in napi_complete_done()
> > > use. This pa
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:03:43 -0700
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>
>> It seems we have to be more careful in napi_complete_done()
>> use. This patch is not a revert, as it seems we can
>> avoid bug that Ville reported by
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:03:43 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> It seems we have to be more careful in napi_complete_done()
> use. This patch is not a revert, as it seems we can
> avoid bug that Ville reported by moving the napi_complete_done()
> test in the spinlock section.
From: Eric Dumazet
It seems we have to be more careful in napi_complete_done()
use. This patch is not a revert, as it seems we can
avoid bug that Ville reported by moving the napi_complete_done()
test in the spinlock section.
Many thanks to Ville for detective work and all tests.
Fixes: 617f012
