From: Jason Wang
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:03:54 +0800
> Looks good to me. The only concern is that whether or not stable can
> accept this patch:
Stable submission will not be a problem, please do not worry about
it :-)
On 2017年11月18日 06:59, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
From: Willem de Bruijn
Tuntap and similar devices can inject GSO packets. Accept type
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, even though not generating UFO natively.
Processes are expected to use feature negotiation such as TUNSETOFFLOAD
to detect supported offl
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn
> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:59:13 -0500
>
>> Tuntap and similar devices can inject GSO packets. Accept type
>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, even though not generating UFO natively.
>>
>> Processes are expected to use feature
From: Willem de Bruijn
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:59:13 -0500
> Tuntap and similar devices can inject GSO packets. Accept type
> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, even though not generating UFO natively.
>
> Processes are expected to use feature negotiation such as TUNSETOFFLOAD
> to detect supported offlo
From: Willem de Bruijn
Tuntap and similar devices can inject GSO packets. Accept type
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, even though not generating UFO natively.
Processes are expected to use feature negotiation such as TUNSETOFFLOAD
to detect supported offload types and refrain from injecting other
packet
