On 4/11/17 8:43 AM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:08:24AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> listing each program is not a sustainable way to do this. It would be
>> simpler to put build targets into a build directory and then ignore the
>> build directory.
> Agreed. It has
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:08:24AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>
> listing each program is not a sustainable way to do this. It would be
> simpler to put build targets into a build directory and then ignore the
> build directory.
Agreed. It has probably been raised before, but if no one else does
On 4/11/17 6:14 AM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:49:10PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> Good point, we should also add '*.o' in that case for the
>> TEST_GEN_FILES specified objs that clang generates.
>
> Think that is covered by other files but added. Would it be
>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:49:10PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Good point, we should also add '*.o' in that case for the
> TEST_GEN_FILES specified objs that clang generates.
Think that is covered by other files but added. Would it be
okay to ignore all the generated files, like the below?
On 04/11/2017 01:35 PM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Alemayhu
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
index
Signed-off-by: Alexander Alemayhu
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
index 541d9d7fad5a..2fe8766e204f 100644
---