From: Jiri Benc
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:40:40 +0200
> We already have IFLA_IPTUN_ netlink attributes. The IP_TUN_ attributes look
> very similar, yet they serve very different purpose. This is confusing for
> anyone trying to implement a user space tool supporting lwt.
>
> As the IP_TUN_ attri
On 08/14/15 at 04:40pm, Jiri Benc wrote:
> We already have IFLA_IPTUN_ netlink attributes. The IP_TUN_ attributes look
> very similar, yet they serve very different purpose. This is confusing for
> anyone trying to implement a user space tool supporting lwt.
>
> As the IP_TUN_ attributes are used
We already have IFLA_IPTUN_ netlink attributes. The IP_TUN_ attributes look
very similar, yet they serve very different purpose. This is confusing for
anyone trying to implement a user space tool supporting lwt.
As the IP_TUN_ attributes are used only for the lightweight tunnels, prefix
them with
