Thanks fixed in v3.
On 11/2/15, 11:11 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Please check on what was intended.
>
> julia
>
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
>> CC: kbuild-...@01.org
>> In-Reply-To: <1446498529-50275-1-git-send-email-ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> TO: Roopa Prabhu
>> CC: ebied..
Please check on what was intended.
julia
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, kbuild test robot wrote:
> CC: kbuild-...@01.org
> In-Reply-To: <1446498529-50275-1-git-send-email-ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> TO: Roopa Prabhu
> CC: ebied...@xmission.com, rshea...@brocade.com, da...@davemloft.net,
> netdev@vger.ke
From: Roopa Prabhu
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:08:49 -0800
> + if ((nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD) ||
> + (nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN))
> + continue;
A single "& (RTNH_F_DEAD | RTNH_F_LINKDOWN)" is more efficient and
more canonical.
> + if ((nh
From: Roopa Prabhu
Adds support for RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flags on mpls
routes due to link events. Also adds code to ignore dead
routes during route selection
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu
---
RFC to v1:
Addressed a few comments from Eric and Robert:
- remove support for
