From: David Ahern
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:58:22 -0700
> Moving the loopback into a VRF breaks networking for the default VRF.
> Since the VRF device is the loopback for VRF domains, there is no
> reason to move the loopback. Given the repercussions, block attempts
>
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 07:58 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Moving the loopback into a VRF breaks networking for the default VRF.
> Since the VRF device is the loopback for VRF domains, there is no
> reason to move the loopback. Given the repercussions, block attempts
> to set lo into a VRF.
>
>
Moving the loopback into a VRF breaks networking for the default VRF.
Since the VRF device is the loopback for VRF domains, there is no
reason to move the loopback. Given the repercussions, block attempts
to set lo into a VRF.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
---