From: Sowmini Varadhan
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:28:22 -0400
> On (06/26/18 10:53), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 10:53:23 -0400
>> From: Sowmini Varadhan
>> To: David Miller
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rds-de...@oss.oracle.com
>> Subject: Re: [rds-devel] [PATCH
On (06/26/18 10:53), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 10:53:23 -0400
> From: Sowmini Varadhan
> To: David Miller
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rds-de...@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [rds-devel] [PATCH net-next] rds: clean up loopback
>
> and just to add, the fix itself is
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Sowmini Varadhan
wrote:
> On (06/26/18 16:48), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> it probably hit the race by a pure luck of the large program, but then
>> never had the same luck when tried to remove any syscalls.
>> So it can make sense to submit several test requests to
On (06/26/18 16:48), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> it probably hit the race by a pure luck of the large program, but then
> never had the same luck when tried to remove any syscalls.
> So it can make sense to submit several test requests to get more testing.
How does one submit test requests by email?
On (06/26/18 23:29), David Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> Since this probably fixes syzbot reports, this can be targetted
> >> at 'net' instead?
> >
> > that thought occurred to me but I wanted to be conservative and have
> > it in net-next first, have the syzkaller-bugs team confirm the
> > the fixes
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Sowmini Varadhan
wrote:
> On (06/26/18 23:29), David Miller wrote:
>>
>> I think there is a way to ask syzbot to test a patch in an
>> email.
>
> Dmitry/syzkaller-bugs, can you clarify?
>
> This is for the cluster of dup reports like
>
On (06/26/18 23:29), David Miller wrote:
>
> I think there is a way to ask syzbot to test a patch in an
> email.
Dmitry/syzkaller-bugs, can you clarify?
This is for the cluster of dup reports like
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller-bugs/zBph8Vu-q2U
and (most recently)
From: Sowmini Varadhan
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:40:43 -0400
> On (06/26/18 22:23), David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Since this probably fixes syzbot reports, this can be targetted
>> at 'net' instead?
>
> that thought occurred to me but I wanted to be conservative and have
> it in net-next first,
On (06/26/18 22:23), David Miller wrote:
>
> Since this probably fixes syzbot reports, this can be targetted
> at 'net' instead?
that thought occurred to me but I wanted to be conservative and have
it in net-next first, have the syzkaller-bugs team confirm the
the fixes and then backport to
From: Sowmini Varadhan
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:41:25 -0700
> The RDS core module creates rds_connections based on callbacks
> from rds_loop_transport when sending/receiving packets to local
> addresses.
>
> These connections will need to be cleaned up when they are
> created from a netns that
On (06/25/18 06:41), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
:
> Add the changes aligned with the changes from
> commit ebeeb1ad9b8a ("rds: tcp: use rds_destroy_pending() to synchronize
> netns/module teardown and rds connection/workq management") for
> rds_loop_transport
FWIW, I am optimistic that this will
The RDS core module creates rds_connections based on callbacks
from rds_loop_transport when sending/receiving packets to local
addresses.
These connections will need to be cleaned up when they are
created from a netns that is not init_net, and that netns is deleted.
Add the changes aligned with
12 matches
Mail list logo
